"An August 2009 study by Search Engine Watch indicates that Google gets about 65% of total searches, Yahoo gets 15%, and MSN/Bing gets about 10%. Looking exclusively at PPC market share, a Rimm-Kaufmann group blog in March 2009 shows that Google dominates with 80% of PPC market share, while Yahoo gets about 15% and MSN/Bing lags with only about 5%."
Monday, January 11, 2010
Three PPC Predictions For 2010 | PPC Without Pity
Posted by Andis Kaulins at 1/11/2010 05:06:00 PM
Friday, October 30, 2009
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Blogthings - You are a Self-Discoverer: "
|You are a Self-Discoverer|
You're not religious, but you've created your own kind of spirituality.
Introspective and thoughtful, you tend to look inward for the divine.
You are distrusting of all forms of organized religion.
You especially dislike religious gurus and leaders, who you feel are charlatans.
Posted by Andis Kaulins at 8/03/2005 02:59:00 PM
Monday, January 17, 2005
Wednesday, January 28, 2004
The George F. Will article at the Sacramento Bee entitled Ueber-left fails in San Francisco surely indicates that the flower-power days of Haight-Ashbury and their aftermath have left their mark on the Golden Gate City in a manner no one really could have expected. Given the constant and real danger of a strong earthquake in this region in the future, is this a Sodom and Gomorrah of modern times?
Posted by Andis Kaulins at 1/28/2004 02:24:00 AM
Wednesday, January 07, 2004
You'll never get to heaven if you break my heart...
Via Southern Appeal we are led to Begging the Question and a discussion about various polls indicating that
"94% of Americans believe in heaven
1% believe they are going to hell
92% believe in God and 85% in heaven
74% believe hell exists
84% of all adults say that they believe in the survival of the soul after death
of these, three-quarters (76%) expect to go to heaven
This represents 64% of the total population.
Only 2% of those who believe in life after death expect to go to hell
while 4% think they will go to purgatory."
Begging the Question wonders about the 2% of those who believe in life after death but expect to go to hell, as if there was something wrong with THEM.
YahooPundit has no doubt about those 2%.
Those are the honest ones.
YahooPundit worries about the 76% of the allegedly god-fearing ones (64% of the population !)
who are so dishonest or deluded as to think they will get to heaven based on their PRESENT way of life.
They should all answer the following questions, and reconsider.
What does it take to get into heaven? and why should YOU be chosen?
To help you make this decision, here are my questions:
Have you ever done anything mean?
Have you ever made life worse for someone else?
Have you ever made life worse for someone else by making YOUR life better?
Have you repented and improved? or do you still make life miserable for some of your other humans?
Do you spend your time filling YOUR bank account, feeding YOUR face and those of YOUR loved ones? at the same time that others - perhaps just as deserving as you are - are doing without? or are doing with LESS. What justifies this in the eyes of YOUR maker?
What do you CONSUME and what do you SHARE? And is yours generally the LION's SHARE?
Are you OVERWEIGHT because you are consuming for YOU? Are you "overweight" in other areas of life as well? Are you selfish?
What else are you consuming for just YOU?
Is your life GOOD? what about the OTHER guys? Too bad for them? It's a tough world? Survival of the fittest?
Do you live better than 90% percent of the world population? maybe even 99% ?
What have YOU done to justify YOUR preferred position? or did this come to you by birth? family? inheritance? connections? good fortune?
If you claim to work hard, are there others on this planet who work HARDER? but who ENJOY their life less, through less money, for example.
What reason is there that someone ELSE should be working harder than you are - in the MINES? or elsewhere?
If you have an EASIER life, why should YOU get into heaven?
What if you do NOTHING to help those who have a more DIFFICULT time of it?
Should God let YOU in?
Some people think that getting into Heaven is automatic if they simply allege belief in THEIR faith,
which THEY themselves have chosen. As if a SELFISH choice of religion would open the heavenly gates.
How selfish and how foolish - to think that choice of a "man-made" religion gives any advantage.
The World Trade Center bombers allegedly did what they did for THEIR faith.
They were trying to buy their way into heaven by killing thousands of innocent people. They were sick. They were deluded.
You do not seriously think that a God, if such exists, will allow mass-murderers into Heaven, do you?
In fact, God will not allow ANY murderers or martyrers - see how similar the words are - into heaven, regardless of their RELIGION.
Some people even think that praying will get THEM into heaven - the more prayer the better, especially prayer FOR THEMSELVES.
The World Trade Center bombers prayed five times a day - and still did TERRIBLE things.
These were Terrible Things that NO GOD will ever forgive. All terrorists are headed straight to hell, in any religion.
BELIEF alone will not get you into Heaven. Something else is required.
What about GOOD deeds towards your FELLOW man? Is this not the RIGHTFUL creed of RELIGION? To HELP our fellow men?
What have YOU done to make this world a better place since YOU got here?
Or is your life no better than the beasts, fish and fowl? devour and be devoured? the law of the jungle?
Write down the specific names of the people on this planet who you have personally helped.
Write down what you have done to improve the lives of those around you.
Have other people been BETTER helpers? Do other people do MORE?
Have you done MORE or LESS than the SAINTS ? - who, of course, deserve to greet St. Peter.
But do YOU?
How many people that you know are THANKFUL that YOU are here on this planet EARTH?
Are they MORE or LESS than those who you have made as ENEMIES?
Could those you helped be MORE in number? many MORE?
Do you MAKE enemies? Could your enemies be FEWER in number?
Are they your enemies because of the clash of SELFISH interests?
Does this increase or decrease your heavenly chances?
What percentage of your time do you FILL pleasing your own SELF?
Is that the Ticket to Heaven?
Are others around pleasing their own SELVES as much or less than YOU?
Are they going to Heaven?
Look at the people around you who YOU think are NOT going to Heaven.
Do you have any characteristics which are SIMILAR to theirs?
Is your life guided by what is good for YOU?
and too bad for the other guy. It's a dog-eat-dog world, is it not?
Do you not want to get into Heaven because that would be good for YOU?
and for YOUR soul?
What about all the OTHER souls?
Why should GOD let YOU into the Heavenly Gates just because YOU want in?
Did you earn it?
Now answer the question of Heaven again.
Seriously, will you get into Heaven?
and do you DESERVE to go to Heaven? based upon your GOOD deeds to your fellow men?
Do you deserve it MORE so than how many people on Earth?
Do you deserve it LESS than how many people Earth?
How full is it up there? How many rooms do they have left? Are you sure they will have a place left for you?
What decision will St. Peter make if you CONTINUE to live as you are living?
The guess of YahooPundit is - that you can do MORE, much MORE - to justify YOUR ENTRY into Heaven.
Of course, you MAY get into Heaven anyway ... but don't count on it.
Posted by Andis Kaulins at 1/07/2004 04:41:00 PM
Wednesday, November 12, 2003
Who are America's Celebrities ?
Alex Massie comments as follows on yet another journalist trying to make a career by making up stories:
"Young journalist makes things up on small, if highly respected, Washington weekly. Nobody dead. End of story. This story, this rumpus, tells us nothing about modern America, only about the weakness of Glass's character and the shrill egotism of American journalism."
Well, it is in fact a disturbing commentary on modern America because the young journalist in question, who even managed to get into law school afterwards (how that?), has written a book about himself, and there is even a film, and this person is then invited to TV shows and the like. He will probably become rich and successful wielding the power that money wields. The society does not have its priorities straight.
Are people like this America's modern celebrities?
In some cases, it appears to be so.
It is a very unfortunate statement on the vapid tastes of a certain portion of the American public.
We might call this "junk culture".
To be fair, I suppose it exists in Europe as well, if one views the recent junk books written here recently by people like Boris Becker and Dieter Bohlen, which pander to the lowest of tastes.
Whatever. It is still mindless fare for the mindless.
Posted by Andis Kaulins at 11/12/2003 01:00:00 AM
Tuesday, November 11, 2003
More on DMOZ, Yahoo and Google, seemingly confirming some of my arguments about DMOZ as a total disaster, and finding similar problems in other search engines.
The Scripting News Archive: 10/20/2003 writes:
"Here's what I may just do. I could turn Scripting News into a directory. Forget the weblog. We already have enough of those. My directory would be the top of the tree of knowledge, like Yahoo used to be....
Google's directory of weblog tools. None of the tools I wrote made the list. Centralized directories on the Web are like buggy whips for cars. Let's fix this bug. Google, this makes you look like a total .... Your tool is listed first, and your competitor's tools aren't listed at all. When will it become too embarassing to support this antiquated model.
When I first posted that I thought it was just a repurposing-DMOZ-problem, so it was a question of how Google looked, not anything they had actually done. But then Seth Dillingham posted a pointer showing that Radio UserLand is actually on the DMOZ list for weblog tools, so Google modified the list to take Radio out. This is surprising, and imho, requires an explanation. Did they modify it? If so why? And do they modify search results to favor their products and services? This is scary stuff. "
Posted by Andis Kaulins at 11/11/2003 11:07:00 PM
LIfe and Eclipses
J-9 at achangintimes.com
writes upon seeing the lunar eclipse November 9, 2003 that:
"I guess I have the 'I'll never grow up' Peter Pan thing going, but I love it, and I hope it never leaves me. So, last night, while people around the world were still busy killing themselves off, I took a time out to think about life, and the beauty of it all. It's a gift. Open it, say thank you, and enjoy it. Life's a one time opportunity."
Posted by Andis Kaulins at 11/11/2003 10:48:00 PM
Monday, November 03, 2003
DMOZ The Open Directory Project is a Farce
HUMANS DO NOT DO IT BETTER
"Humans do it better" is the motto of the DMOZ so-called "open directory", i.e. a search engine which has a catalogue style in which the entries are made by hand by humans. In fact, humans do NOT do it better - rather, they are far more subjective than Google or AllTheWeb. Basically - you can forget the Open Directory as just one more failed attempt based on the gullible idea that humans are benevolent and objective, which they are not.
Why this directory is called the open directory is anybody's guess, because that name has nothing to do with reality. The Open Directory is a misnomer. The OPD is not only falsely named, but the name is quite misleading.
There are now allegedly ca. 60,000 editors - human Yahoos in the Gulliver Swift sense - sometimes even having competing pages of their own in the areas they are supervising - who are by no means necessarily objective or open to new submitted pages - I speak here from experience gained by persons who have tried to become editors. Once these editors exist in a particular area, the area is mostly closed to new editors, unless they are part of that crowd. You have thereby set up a fixed group of "good old boys" who rule their terrain like a company-town sheriff or mayor.
LOOK OUT: TITLE AND DESCRIPTION OF YOUR SITE ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE by DMOZ EDITORS
As the "Open Directory" (copyright by Netscape) itself states, it has its own strict policy of DISCRETIONARY inclusion OR exclusion of websites which has nothing to do with any OPEN-NESS of any kind.
Here is its posted policy: [emphasis added]
"Please recognize that making the ODP a useful resource requires us to exercise broad editorial discretion in determining the content and structure of the directory. That discretion extends (but is not limited) to what sites to include, where in the directory sites are placed, whether and when to include more than one link to a site, when deep linking is appropriate, and the content of the title and description of the site. In addition, a site's placement in the directory is subject to change or deletion at any time at our sole discretion. You should not rely on any aspect of a site's inclusion in the directory. Please understand that an editor's exercise of discretion may not always treat all submissions equally. You may not always agree with our choices, but we hope you recognize that we do our best to make fair and reasonable decisions."
I know of cases where a site has been submitted to DMOZ only to have the entire title and site description changed without the knowledge of the submitter and at the pure whim of the so-called "open" editors, who give the website any name and description they choose, even derogatory descriptions. Someone then accessing that site's description on DMOZ through search engines such as Google or AllTheWeb THEN thinks that the website owner or webmaster has made up these abominable titles or descirptions, which is simply not true.
This kind of thing should be forbidden by law.
DMOZ should be closed down as an abomination, as an abomination to the Web and as an abominaton to the human spirit, and as an abomination to freedom. How dare a directory be run under the above stated conditions.
Posted by Andis Kaulins at 11/03/2003 09:01:00 PM
I was watching CNN
showing a couple sifting through the charred remains of their house,
which had just been destroyed by one of the forest fires raging through the US.
They were looking for the wife's wedding ring
which she had inadvertently left behind
when they were evacuated due to the fire.
After a day of what appeared to be fruitless searching through rubble and ash,
the wedding ring was suddenly found and the woman exclaimed,
with a great smile on her face, and in genuine happiness,
while standing on the ashes of her home,
"Life is Good".
There is something wonderful about humanity - we Yahoos - which is expressed in that story.
Posted by Andis Kaulins at 11/03/2003 02:35:00 AM
Thursday, October 09, 2003
Jonathan Swift was one of the first ancient "bloggers" as it were, and his book, Gulliver's Travels, reports the travels of a fictional "Lemuel Gulliver", whose experiences in "unexplored territories" are intended as social and political satire on humanity, depicted in Gulliver's Travels as "Yahoos", where Yahoo is a word invented by Swift as follows:
"composed of yah and ugh, both interjections implying disgust."
In Swift's day, critical commentary on the existing mainstream power structure was frowned upon by the establishment. Swift was in fact banished to Ireland for his irreverent writings about "the Yahoos".
The writer of this blog uses the intentionally punny Pseudo-nym "Houyhnhnm" (Hou-yhnhnm) from Gulliver's Travels, a Swiftian term which is defined as:
Hou*yhnhnm (?), n.
One of the race of horses described by Swift in his imaginary travels of Lemuel Gulliver. The Houyhnhnms were endowed with reason and noble qualities; subject to them were Yahoos, a race of brutes having the form and all the worst vices of men.
As one might thus imagine, YahooPundit comments on humanity.
Posted by Andis Kaulins at 10/09/2003 12:35:00 PM
Sunday, October 05, 2003
As these noble HOUYHNHNMS are endowed by nature with a general disposition to all virtues, and have no conceptions or ideas of what is evil in a rational creature, so their grand maxim is, to cultivate reason, and to be wholly governed by it. Neither is reason among them a point problematical, as with us, where men can argue with plausibility on both sides of the question, but strikes you with immediate conviction; as it must needs do, where it is not mingled, obscured, or discoloured, by passion and interest.
I remember it was with extreme difficulty that I could bring my master to understand the meaning of the word opinion, or how a point could be disputable; because reason taught us to affirm or deny only where we are certain; and beyond our knowledge we cannot do either. So that controversies, wranglings, disputes, and positiveness, in false or dubious propositions, are evils unknown among the HOUYHNHNMS. In the like manner, when I used to explain to him our several systems of natural philosophy, he would laugh, "that a creature pretending to reason, should value itself upon the knowledge of other people's conjectures, and in things where that knowledge, if it were certain, could be of no use." Wherein he agreed entirely with the sentiments of Socrates, as Plato delivers them; which I mention as the highest honour I can do that prince of philosophers - I have often since reflected, what destruction such doctrine would make in the libraries of Europe; and how many paths of fame would be then shut up in the learned world.
Posted by Andis Kaulins at 10/05/2003 01:45:00 PM
The ISandIS Network
Our Websites and Blogs: 3D Printing and More 99 is not 100 Aabecis AK Photo Blog Ancient Egypt Weblog Ancient Signs (the book) Ancient World Blog AndisKaulins.com Anthropomorphic Design Archaeology Travel Photos (blog) Archaeology Travel Photos (Flickr) Archaeo Pundit Arts Pundit Astrology and Birth Baltic Coachman Bible Pundit Biotechnology Pundit Book Pundit Chronology of the Ancient World Computer Pundit DVD Pundit Easter Island Script Echolat edu.edu Einstein’s Voice Energy Environment and Climate Blog Etruscan Bronze Liver of Piacenza EU Laws EU Legal EU Pundit FaceBook Pundit Gadget Pundit Garden Pundit Golf Pundit Google Pundit Gourmet Pundit Hand Proof HousePundit Human Migrations Idea Pundit Illyrian Language Indus Valley Script Infinity One : The Secret of the First Disk (the game) Jostandis Journal Pundit Kaulins Genealogy Blog Kaulinsium Kiel & Kieler Latvian Blog LawPundit.com Law Pundit Blog LexiLine.com LexiLine Group Lexiline Journal Library Pundit Lingwhizt LinkedIn Literary Pundit Magnifichess Make it Music Maps and Cartography Megalithic World Megaliths Blog) Megaliths.net Minoan Culture Mutatis Mutandis Nanotech Pundit Nostratic Languages Official Pundit Phaistos Disc Pharaonic Hieroglyphs Photo Blog of the World Pinterest Prehistoric Art Pundit Private Wealth Blog PunditMania Quanticalian Quick to Travel Quill Pundit Road Pundit Shelfari SlideShare (akaulins) Sport Pundit Star Pundit Stars Stones and Scholars (blog) Stars Stones and Scholars (book) Stonehenge Pundit The Enchanted Glass Twitter Pundit UbiquitousPundit Vision of Change VoicePundit WatchPundit Wine Pundit Word Pundit xistmz YahooPundit zistmz